Common Criteria

Common Criteria

The Common Criteria (CC) is an internationally recognized standard (ISO/IEC 15408) for computer security certification. It provides a framework for evaluating the security of Information Technology (IT) products and systems. Understanding Common Criteria is vital for anyone involved in cybersecurity, risk management, or the procurement of secure systems, particularly within regulated industries like finance, where adherence to standards is paramount. This article provides a beginner-friendly overview of the Common Criteria, its components, and its relevance to modern security practices.

What is Common Criteria?

Essentially, Common Criteria is a collection of security requirements and testing methods. It’s not a product itself, but a way to *evaluate* how well a product meets specified security goals. The standard aims to provide assurance that IT products protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data – core tenets of information security. The rigorous evaluation process helps to reduce the risk of vulnerabilities and ensures products function as expected in a secure manner. Think of it as a standardized checklist and testing procedure for security.

Key Concepts

The Common Criteria revolves around two primary components:

• Protection Profiles (PPs): These define the security requirements for a specific type of product or system. A PP is essentially a template outlining what security features are needed for a particular application. For example, a PP might exist for a firewall, a database, or a cryptographic module. They are crucial for focused penetration testing.
• Security Targets (STs): This document details how a specific product meets the requirements outlined in a Protection Profile. The ST is created by the vendor and is the basis for the security evaluation. It’s a detailed explanation of the product’s security architecture and its compliance with the selected PP. It's similar to a detailed trading plan outlining the strategy and expected outcome.

Evaluation Assurance Levels (EALs)

The Common Criteria defines Evaluation Assurance Levels (EALs) ranging from EAL1 (basic assurance) to EAL7 (highest assurance). These levels dictate the depth and rigor of the security evaluation. Higher EALs require more extensive testing and analysis, providing greater confidence in the product's security.

EAL	Description
EAL1	Basic assurance - minimal security testing. Suitable for lower-risk applications.
EAL2	Basic structural testing - some testing of the design and implementation.
EAL3	Methodical design testing - more rigorous testing, including vulnerability analysis.
EAL4	Methodical verification - includes design and implementation testing, and some security management processes.
EAL5	Semi-formal design and verification - more formal methods are used, including formal specifications.
EAL6	Semi-formal verification - even more formal methods, with detailed design and implementation verification.
EAL7	Formal verification - the highest level of assurance, using formal methods to provide mathematical proof of security.

Choosing the appropriate EAL depends on the risk level associated with the product and its intended use. For example, a system handling sensitive financial data would likely require a higher EAL than a simple web-based game. It’s analogous to selecting the right risk-reward ratio for a trade.

Common Criteria and Security Functions

The Common Criteria organizes security requirements into several functional areas:

• Access Control: Ensuring only authorized users can access resources. This is related to position sizing in trading – controlling exposure.
• Cryptography: Protecting data using encryption and other cryptographic techniques. Important for technical analysis of secure communications.
• Data Integrity: Ensuring data is not altered without authorization. Similar to verifying the integrity of trading data.
• Audit: Tracking security-relevant events. Relates to backtesting – analyzing past performance.
• Identification and Authentication: Verifying the identity of users. Crucial for market order security.
• Security Management: Managing security policies and procedures. Comparable to portfolio management.
• Physical Security: Protecting physical access to the system.

The Evaluation Process

The evaluation process is typically conducted by an accredited testing laboratory. It involves a detailed review of the Security Target, along with comprehensive testing to verify that the product meets the specified security requirements. The process can be expensive and time-consuming, but it provides a high level of assurance. It resembles a thorough fundamental analysis before making a significant investment. The evaluation considers various attack vectors and utilizes both black-box and white-box testing techniques.

Relevance to Crypto Futures

While Common Criteria might seem distant from the world of crypto futures trading, it's becoming increasingly relevant. As financial institutions adopt digital assets and related technologies, they need to ensure the security of their systems. This includes:

• Exchange Security: Crypto exchanges should ideally have systems certified to Common Criteria standards, particularly regarding access control and data integrity. Monitoring order book depth can provide insight into potential vulnerabilities.
• Wallet Security: Secure digital wallets, especially those used by institutions, should adhere to security standards like Common Criteria. Monitoring trading volume can highlight potential security breaches.
• Smart Contract Security: Although not directly covered by Common Criteria, the principles of secure design and rigorous testing are applicable to smart contracts. Analyzing candlestick patterns can sometimes reveal anomalies indicative of malicious activity.
• Risk Management Frameworks: Common Criteria can be integrated into broader risk management frameworks used by financial institutions dealing with crypto assets. Using stop-loss orders is a risk management technique mirroring the goal of mitigating potential losses.
• Regulatory Compliance: Increasingly, regulations require financial institutions to demonstrate a commitment to security standards, and Common Criteria can be used to meet these requirements. Understanding market regulations is crucial for compliant trading.
• Algorithmic Trading Security: Ensuring the security of algorithms used for automated trading is paramount. Monitoring moving averages can help identify deviations from expected behavior.
• Data Security in Trading Platforms: Protecting sensitive trading data requires robust security measures aligned with Common Criteria principles. Analyzing Fibonacci retracements doesn’t inherently relate to security, but highlights the importance of data integrity.
• API Security: Securing APIs used for trading and data access is critical. Monitoring Relative Strength Index (RSI) doesn’t relate directly to security, but reinforces the need for accurate data.
• System Hardening: Implementing security best practices to reduce the attack surface. Similar to chart pattern analysis – identifying weaknesses.
• Incident Response Planning: Having a plan in place to respond to security incidents. Analogous to a trading strategy for reacting to market events.
• Vulnerability Management: Regularly scanning for and patching vulnerabilities. Like monitoring MACD for potential trading signals.
• Security Audits: Periodic reviews of security controls. Similar to volume-weighted average price (VWAP) analysis – tracking performance.
• 'Access Control Lists (ACLs): Managing user permissions. Equivalent to position limits – controlling exposure.
• Encryption of Data at Rest and in Transit: Protecting data confidentiality. Comparable to using encryption for private keys.
• 'Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Adding an extra layer of security. Like diversifying a trading portfolio for risk reduction.

Conclusion

The Common Criteria provides a robust framework for evaluating the security of IT products and systems. While it might seem complex, understanding its core principles is essential for professionals in the cybersecurity and financial technology sectors. As the crypto futures market matures and becomes more integrated with traditional finance, adherence to security standards like Common Criteria will become increasingly important for maintaining trust and mitigating risk.

Information security Cryptography Cybersecurity Risk management Vulnerability assessment Penetration testing Security architecture Access control Data integrity Audit trail Authentication Security policy Evaluation Assurance Level Protection Profile Security Target Trading plan Risk-reward ratio Technical analysis Trading data Backtesting Market order Portfolio management Fundamental analysis Position sizing Stop-loss orders Market regulations Automated trading Algorithmic trading Incident response Vulnerability management Security audits Position limits Private keys Multi-factor authentication Order book depth Trading volume Candlestick patterns Moving averages Fibonacci retracements Relative Strength Index (RSI) MACD Volume-weighted average price (VWAP) Chart pattern analysis

Recommended Crypto Futures Platforms

Platform	Futures Highlights	Sign up
Binance Futures	Leverage up to 125x, USDⓈ-M contracts	Register now
Bybit Futures	Inverse and linear perpetuals	Start trading
BingX Futures	Copy trading and social features	Join BingX
Bitget Futures	USDT-collateralized contracts	Open account
BitMEX	Crypto derivatives platform, leverage up to 100x	BitMEX

Join our community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @cryptofuturestrading to get analysis, free signals, and more!